Picture Gallery
Here's the result of today's gold-panning:
1) CT-SEN: A little hypocrisy from the Connecticut for Lieberman party.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c603/1c603dc3fc16f148edbe9afe336f6d55b159e162" alt=""
(incidentally, I heard from some people out in Connecticut that the state party is not devoting the kind of resources to Lamont that they would normally do for a Senate nominee. I keep hearing about Lamont's great GOTV campaign, and the race is tightening, but every damn muckety-muck in the state is hedging their bets. I'm hopeful, but it's tough to fight City Hall. In a way it makes me want to fight more, though)
2) CA-GOV: This is some bullshit.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7ca5/a7ca5fc479610d537445fafc0efaf4b0faf300de" alt=""
Prop. 85 would endanger children. Everybody wants to reduce abortions, but not every family has the same level of communication. You'd be asking kids to confront abusive parents. The waiver from a judge is ridiculous. You find me the teen that would be able to face a court, or that would even want to do so. Oh yeah, and the voters already defeated this last year. Why am I voting on this AGAIN? Incidentally this is being put out not by the Yes on 85 people, but the California Republican Party. That's where they are. They are not so-called moderates like their standard-bearer governor.
3) This is the joke I've been making for 2 years.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39f6c/39f6c02d144045d8cb04dfdd530b05b432491831" alt=""
<< Home