Joe Sestak Will Beat Arlen Specter In The 2010 PA Primary

There, I've said it. I'm not above making some predictions. And this one is based in some reality, for once! The fact is that Arlen Specter's standing with voters in Pennsylvania has slipped significantly a year out from any primary. His job approval rating is down to 34%, and among Democrats, only 43% believe he deserves re-election. In a head-to-head matchup, Specter only garners 33% against Sestak, who has 13%, with a whopping 48% undecided.

These are much better numbers than, for example, Ned Lamont had at a similar time, nearly a year out from his primary against Joe Lieberman. And the trends in terms of key stakeholders are moving Sestak's way as well. This Open Left piece is hilarious:

At first glance, Joe Sestak reiterating that he is a co-sponsor of the Employee Free Choice Act while speaking at a United Steelworkers conference doesn't seem like much of a news story. As the title of this post implies, however, there is something that made it very interesting...

The catch is that Senator Arlen Specter did not speak at this event. In fact, he was disinvited.

Here is the full story, courtesy of an email exchange with Jim Savage, who is President of a Steelworkers local here in Philadelphia:

"The Senator [Arlen Specter] was invited & confirmed as the keynote speaker."

"There was quite an uproar when we found out. He was uninvited because of the rank-and-file reaction."

"Also, it's worth noting that the Senator was none too happy about it."

At that point, Sestak was then invited. Before he spoke, he was "introduced to the delegates as "our next Senator" to a rousing ovation."

The general sentiment toward Specter was "fuck'm."

I have to say, talking to local union leaders is a lot more fun than talking with communications staff.

Sestak keeps dipping his toe in the water and intimating that he'll get in the race. At some point he'll have to go ahead with a full-fledged announcement. But if, as appears likely, he does run, I think he'll win. I've certainly been wrong before, but then again, so has Larry Sabato....

...and by the way, this is exactly why Specter came out today in favor of the public option for health care reform. He will not be a problem in this fight, unlike what would have been the case if Sestak shied away from running.

A Labor Day Windfall

As we celebrate the working man today, a large group of them have endorsed Sen. Edwards.

John Edwards won the endorsement of the United Steelworkers and the United Mine Workers of America as more than 1,000 union members cheered the Democratic presidential candidate.

“America was not built on Wall Street. America was built by steelworkers and mine workers,” Edwards told supporters at a downtown Labor Day rally and parade [...]

Earlier, Edwards suggested New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s campaign represents politics-as-usual in Washington and that Edwards represents a break from the past.

“We just have a disagreement,” Edwards said on ABC’s “Good Morning America.” “Sen. Clinton defends Washington lobbyists and the system that exists in Washington and thinks she can work within that system. If that were true we would already have universal health care. If that were true America would already be attacking global warming in a serious way.”

Edwards has also received the Carpenter's Union endorsement. Chris Dodd locked up the IAFF (firefighter's union), and Hillary Clinton has the machinist's union and the transportation workers, although the machinists also said that if their members wanted to vote Republican they should go with Mike Huckabee.

John Edwards appeals to workers because he talks about their issues. He cares about the fact that we have to work longer and for more hours just to get by in today's economy. He cares about all of us struggling with health care, even if we have insurance, even if we are the son of a famous scion like Sandra Day O'Connor. He cares about all of the manufacturing jobs leaving this country in droves, and the substandard imports coming from places like China, and the resistance to regulate them in any meaningful way. This is why he has earned the respect of people like President Jimmy Carter.

"I can say without equivocation that no one who is running for president has presented anywhere near as comprehensive and accurate a prediction of what our country ought to do in the field of environmental quality, in the field of health care for those who are not presently insured, for those who struggle with poverty."

Edwards is clearly betting it all on Iowa, with a message of populism and fighting powerful entrenched interests. It's an unusual campaign that the country may be ready to approve if they get to see it.